Member-only story
The One Minute Geographer: Shoestring Countries
We don’t hear the term much anymore but political geographers used to talk a lot about “shoestring countries” — nations that had an elongated shape. In theory, this lack of compactness could present problems in border defense, transportation expense and political difficulties in holding distant regions of a nation together. Chile, Norway and Malawi were most often cited as being shoestring countries.
But form and function are different things. Just looking at simple population density and distribution tells us that in all three of these cases, a large majority (80% or more) of each nation’s population is clustered in one part of the country. Where it matters — among its inhabitants — each nation can function as if it were a relatively compact nation.
So are there any ‘shoestring countries’ in function rather than form? Maybe. We’ll look at Canada in the next post.
Here’s the previous post about COVID Impacts on Nooks and Crannies on the US-Canada Border https://jimwfonseca.medium.com/the-one-minute-geographer-covid-impacts-on-nooks-and-crannies-on-the-us-canada-border-151fcdda7659
Follow me on Medium for more from the One Minute Geographer